Control Web Panel

WebPanel => E-Mail => Topic started by: Namaste on October 22, 2020, 02:35:38 PM

Title: gmail problem
Post by: Namaste on October 22, 2020, 02:35:38 PM
I have two servers using cwp.  #1 centos 7 #2 centos 8

#1 email header is good with gmail.
Quote
eturn-Path: <2019@lakeservers.com>
Delivered-To: 2015@lakeservers.com
                                                   
                                                
                         
                                             
                                                 
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [71.214.22.116])
   (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
                                             
   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ED339DAF
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: LAKE SERVERS <2015@lakeservers.com>
From: Lake Servers <2019@lakeservers.com>
Subject: testt
Message-ID: <90ae98ca-b5fe-df2d-2d66-3dfaba86a6b8@lakeservers.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:26 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US

#2 centos 8 gmail header marked as spam
Quote
Return-Path: <info@smadirectory.com>
Delivered-To: 2015@lakeservers.com
Received: from server.rosinto.com (server.rosinto.com [45.79.19.73])
   (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB64F9D74
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [71.214.22.116])
   (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
    key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.rosinto.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DAFC3E844
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: LAKE SERVERS <2015@lakeservers.com>
From: SMA Directory <info@smadirectory.com>
Subject: test
Message-ID: <379cb829-9c32-1aad-4058-2979a74b48a5@smadirectory.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------41DE0BD500F628F2784C5DBB"
Content-Language: en-US

I am going crazy trying to figure why one server is good and the other is bad.
Title: Re: gmail problem
Post by: Namaste on October 22, 2020, 03:02:02 PM
This added to the centos 8 server email header and is most like the cause for gmail grief.

Quote
Received: from server.rosinto.com (server.rosinto.com [45.79.19.73])
   (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB64F9D74
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Title: Re: gmail problem
Post by: CamposMansi on November 18, 2020, 08:16:48 PM
The same
Title: Re: gmail problem
Post by: FreshLondon on November 18, 2020, 09:49:12 PM
This may not pinpoint your error, but damn it helps me with most spam issues:
https://www.mail-tester.com/

Load the site on two tabs, make sure you get different sending email addresses on each tab and then test both servers.
They'll inspect the message, headers, SPF, DKIM, rDNS, blacklisting, email content, etc.. :)
Title: Re: gmail problem
Post by: CamposMansi on November 19, 2020, 03:35:24 PM
Thank you very much in advance, yes, I have an 8.4, it is perfect in everything but google remains the same.
As I have put in another post, this happened a week or two ago.
Title: Re: gmail problem
Post by: FreshLondon on November 19, 2020, 04:18:30 PM
https://mxtoolbox.com/emailhealth/smadirectory.com/

Missing DMARC and SPF records on the domain used to send the email.
Title: Re: gmail problem
Post by: studio4host on November 19, 2020, 07:59:40 PM
you should check with cwp support