Kinda bittersweet though—since this should’ve already been taken care of by CWP themselves.
And that is the point. @Starburst
No one is saying that CSF closure was CWP fault... makes no sense...
What i was saying is that CWP is not providing a clear information about anything. And you are proving that.
Again: yes, there was a update recently in CWP. But
you know what was updated? I bet you can't provide anything that confirm WHAT has been updated, besides the version number in your panel.
That IS the point.The vulnerability in CWP. No one talks about it? Let it go under the rug in silence?
That is NOT how the development of a control panel should go... I still dont see ANY information about it. Yes, was patched, but was silently patched - that is worrying.
And the plans for CSF... you are proving my point there again.
Yes, the guides can be great, but they are NOT from the CWP team itself, are from a third party. It is concerning when is a third party that must start to provide information about basic things, and not the developers of the control panel itself.
And even more, your guides can help... but do we know you? Who are you exactly?
You are providing guides to make critical changes in our systems, that some people without knowledge follow... and yes, the could work. But your guides provide your own mirrors, with your own code in the mix.
How do we know that we can trust you and your code?
Some people will follow your guides, without knowing what are they doing.
And you can be a great person, don't get me wrong. You appear to be here to help... but we are in the internet....
I look at your guides, and they are ok - but i would be worry to use code that is in a unknown mirrror. Would be better if CWP team provide those instead? Yes, it will, because at least CWP we know...