Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
301
Information / Re: Customization of Panel Logo and User Login Logo
« on: November 16, 2020, 03:53:13 PM »
/usr/local/cwpsrv/htdocs/admin/design/img/login.css to dress up your login page.
Css was buried in a gif directory. One can only assume that it was intentional.
Css was buried in a gif directory. One can only assume that it was intentional.
302
SSL / Android problems coming
« on: November 10, 2020, 10:55:41 PM »
Lets encrypt announced that older versions of android os will not work with lets encrypt very soon. You can google to your hearts content.
You can start here. https://letsencrypt.org/2020/11/06/own-two-feet.html
You can start here. https://letsencrypt.org/2020/11/06/own-two-feet.html
303
E-Mail / Re: postfix force ipv4
« on: October 28, 2020, 10:18:16 AM »
I knew there would be at least one sucker who would swallow the bait.
I agree that most only rebuild once. But every time you mess with the dkim stuff you have to rebuild.
Heres the long and the short of the problem. postfix main.cf is MISSING a very important line in the networking settings. Its supposed to be there and it isnt. inet_protocols= is completely missing and was the cause of all my email problems on my new centos 8 server. This is going to cause problems for everyone who is running a server on centos 8.
I dont know who is to blame. But it needs to be fixed.
I agree that most only rebuild once. But every time you mess with the dkim stuff you have to rebuild.
Heres the long and the short of the problem. postfix main.cf is MISSING a very important line in the networking settings. Its supposed to be there and it isnt. inet_protocols= is completely missing and was the cause of all my email problems on my new centos 8 server. This is going to cause problems for everyone who is running a server on centos 8.
I dont know who is to blame. But it needs to be fixed.
304
E-Mail / Re: postfix force ipv4
« on: October 27, 2020, 07:34:57 PM »
Looks like there is no one here smart enough to answer the question.
305
E-Mail / postfix force ipv4
« on: October 27, 2020, 12:33:10 PM »
Postfix config file main.cf does not include option to force ip4. I can do it manually but everytime a rebuild the mailserver, my changes disappear. Is there a template that I can modify?
306
E-Mail / Re: gmail problem
« on: October 22, 2020, 03:02:02 PM »
This added to the centos 8 server email header and is most like the cause for gmail grief.
Quote
Received: from server.rosinto.com (server.rosinto.com [45.79.19.73])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB64F9D74
for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
307
E-Mail / gmail problem
« on: October 22, 2020, 02:35:38 PM »
I have two servers using cwp. #1 centos 7 #2 centos 8
#1 email header is good with gmail.
#2 centos 8 gmail header marked as spam
I am going crazy trying to figure why one server is good and the other is bad.
#1 email header is good with gmail.
Quote
eturn-Path: <2019@lakeservers.com>
Delivered-To: 2015@lakeservers.com
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [71.214.22.116])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ED339DAF
for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: LAKE SERVERS <2015@lakeservers.com>
From: Lake Servers <2019@lakeservers.com>
Subject: testt
Message-ID: <90ae98ca-b5fe-df2d-2d66-3dfaba86a6b8@lakeservers.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:26 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
#2 centos 8 gmail header marked as spam
Quote
Return-Path: <info@smadirectory.com>
Delivered-To: 2015@lakeservers.com
Received: from server.rosinto.com (server.rosinto.com [45.79.19.73])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB64F9D74
for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [71.214.22.116])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by server.rosinto.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DAFC3E844
for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: LAKE SERVERS <2015@lakeservers.com>
From: SMA Directory <info@smadirectory.com>
Subject: test
Message-ID: <379cb829-9c32-1aad-4058-2979a74b48a5@smadirectory.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------41DE0BD500F628F2784C5DBB"
Content-Language: en-US
I am going crazy trying to figure why one server is good and the other is bad.
308
SSL / Trustedhosts RED
« on: October 22, 2020, 01:52:36 PM »
All of my addon domains have a green icon for Trustedhosts
But one (rosinto.com) has red icon for trustedhosts and green icon for
TrustedHosts KeyTable v=DKIM1 v=spf1 Action
Red Green green green
But one (rosinto.com) has red icon for trustedhosts and green icon for
TrustedHosts KeyTable v=DKIM1 v=spf1 Action
Red Green green green
309
CentOS 6 Problems / Re: /htdocs/resources/admin/include/cron.php has expired. in Unknown on line 0
« on: October 13, 2020, 10:38:19 AM »
I have had the same problem in the past. It usually happened when I had not updated in a few months. I learned to keep cwp up to date.
Check your version of cwp.
Check your version of cwp.
310
Information / Re: SoftException UID is smaller than min_uid
« on: October 10, 2020, 12:34:14 PM »
Its the error.log. It hasnt happened since oct 3 so maybe its no longer a problem. I may have over reactivated. 
311
Information / Re: SoftException UID is smaller than min_uid
« on: October 10, 2020, 12:16:05 PM »
I googled that and already learned about your solution before you posted.
Using fix permissions did not change anything. So, either fix permission script is bad or it is something else above my paygrade.
Using fix permissions did not change anything. So, either fix permission script is bad or it is something else above my paygrade.
312
Information / Re: SoftException UID is smaller than min_uid
« on: October 10, 2020, 12:12:13 PM »
lmao. I wondered. A zebra never changes its stripes, especially yours.
Just for you I will include the error message.
Just for you I will include the error message.
Quote
SoftException UID is smaller than min_uid
313
Information / SoftException UID is smaller than min_uid
« on: October 10, 2020, 10:31:38 AM »
Im getting errors in my log file.
314
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: Advanced file editor incomplete directory
« on: October 03, 2020, 02:00:19 PM »
I had a screenshot but you deleted it. Why?
315
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: File Manager - Compress Files Not working
« on: October 03, 2020, 01:56:25 PM »
Compress works for me but decompress does not. I had to use shell.
