Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
61
Information / Re: Is CWP still maintained?
« on: October 08, 2025, 02:36:16 PM »Kinda bittersweet though—since this should’ve already been taken care of by CWP themselves.
And that is the point.
@Starburst
No one is saying that CSF closure was CWP fault... makes no sense...
What i was saying is that CWP is not providing a clear information about anything. And you are proving that.
Again: yes, there was a update recently in CWP. But you know what was updated? I bet you can't provide anything that confirm WHAT has been updated, besides the version number in your panel. That IS the point.
The vulnerability in CWP. No one talks about it? Let it go under the rug in silence?
That is NOT how the development of a control panel should go... I still dont see ANY information about it. Yes, was patched, but was silently patched - that is worrying.
And the plans for CSF... you are proving my point there again.
Yes, the guides can be great, but they are NOT from the CWP team itself, are from a third party. It is concerning when is a third party that must start to provide information about basic things, and not the developers of the control panel itself.
And even more, your guides can help... but do we know you? Who are you exactly?
You are providing guides to make critical changes in our systems, that some people without knowledge follow... and yes, the could work. But your guides provide your own mirrors, with your own code in the mix.
How do we know that we can trust you and your code?
Some people will follow your guides, without knowing what are they doing.
And you can be a great person, don't get me wrong. You appear to be here to help... but we are in the internet....
I look at your guides, and they are ok - but i would be worry to use code that is in a unknown mirrror. Would be better if CWP team provide those instead? Yes, it will, because at least CWP we know...
62
Information / Re: Is CWP still maintained?
« on: October 07, 2025, 09:16:02 PM »
That doesn't solve the issue.
Just because a update was "launch" two days ago, don't say much. Where is the changelog, what changed, do you know?
For what you know, could just be a "minor" bump in the version number...
And the security issue, yes, was solved in days... without any information. Not even a single post from the team to confirm that have existed - and you can see that in the topic. There is still people that think that was because of something in the Wordpress or some website in it...
The lack of comunication IS a problem. The lack of new features is a problem, there is no confirmation about what is going on, the road map, nothing...
Just because a update was "launch" two days ago, don't say much. Where is the changelog, what changed, do you know?
For what you know, could just be a "minor" bump in the version number...
And the security issue, yes, was solved in days... without any information. Not even a single post from the team to confirm that have existed - and you can see that in the topic. There is still people that think that was because of something in the Wordpress or some website in it...
The lack of comunication IS a problem. The lack of new features is a problem, there is no confirmation about what is going on, the road map, nothing...
63
Information / Re: Is CWP still maintained?
« on: October 07, 2025, 02:44:15 PM »
In 28/08/2025 i sent a ticket to support:
"Since CSF will no longer be updated, is there any alternative for CWP? Since there is no firewall directly in the CWP (only the CSF integration), this can have big downsides for the panel.
Announcement here: https://configserver.com/announcement/"
The response:
"Hello.
Yes, we know about the issue.
Regards,"
Indeed, the lack of comunication is concerning.
And CWP appears even more unmaintained to this point. Nothing really is "new".
And don't forget a preaty bad security issue, that was never explained: https://forum.centos-webpanel.com/centos-webpanel-bugs/critical-multiple-cwp-servers-infected-arbitrary-php-code-execution-via-publ/
This happend, and no, is not a issue with the websites or WordPress in the server. Was a issue with CWP that was never publicly confirmed by the team, and was fixed silently with the updates.
The lack of comunication is concerning, and the lack of new updates is also concerning.
Maybe is better start to look for alternatives, because CWP appears every single day more "dead".
"Since CSF will no longer be updated, is there any alternative for CWP? Since there is no firewall directly in the CWP (only the CSF integration), this can have big downsides for the panel.
Announcement here: https://configserver.com/announcement/"
The response:
"Hello.
Yes, we know about the issue.
Regards,"
Indeed, the lack of comunication is concerning.
And CWP appears even more unmaintained to this point. Nothing really is "new".
And don't forget a preaty bad security issue, that was never explained: https://forum.centos-webpanel.com/centos-webpanel-bugs/critical-multiple-cwp-servers-infected-arbitrary-php-code-execution-via-publ/
This happend, and no, is not a issue with the websites or WordPress in the server. Was a issue with CWP that was never publicly confirmed by the team, and was fixed silently with the updates.
The lack of comunication is concerning, and the lack of new updates is also concerning.
Maybe is better start to look for alternatives, because CWP appears every single day more "dead".
64
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: Server Somehow Got Hacked
« on: September 25, 2025, 01:33:00 PM »
Are you talking about the server itself or just a account?
if is just a account, probably is related with THAT account or website in it.
if is just a account, probably is related with THAT account or website in it.
65
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Backup emails sending blank
« on: August 31, 2024, 08:18:49 AM »
Hello,
The notification backup email - using the "new" backup option" - is sending just a small part of the title, with no message at all.
What could be causing this or how can i change the email template?
Thanks
The notification backup email - using the "new" backup option" - is sending just a small part of the title, with no message at all.
What could be causing this or how can i change the email template?
Thanks
66
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: Bug in Shoutcast/AutoDJ
« on: April 12, 2023, 02:39:27 PM »
Done 
But note that this doesn't appear to be a thing just with me: https://forum.centos-webpanel.com/index.php?topic=11651.msg41855#msg41855
But note that this doesn't appear to be a thing just with me: https://forum.centos-webpanel.com/index.php?topic=11651.msg41855#msg41855
67
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Bug in Shoutcast/AutoDJ
« on: April 12, 2023, 07:41:37 AM »
Hello,
I'm trying to install the Shoutcast plugin in my server.
I created a new user "A" and a new ShoutCast Server for that user. After that, i am able to log in as user (in the user panel) and configure the shoutcast, autodj, etc, as is supposed.
Then i create another user "B", and setup another shoutcast server for that user.
I can log in as user "B" and manage that ShoutCast, AutoDJ, etc.
But if i try to login as user "A" again, i'm unable of see or control any radio. The page only shows the error message: "Servercast Not available"
I think there is a bug in the creation process of the shoutcast, where if a new user is created with shoutcast access, only that will be able to manage the shoutcast rádio. In short: only the most recent user is able to create and manage the shoutcast.
I see a similar bug dated from some months ago in the Bug Tracking, but related with JS - i don't think is about that.
There is any report of this issue?
Thanks
I'm trying to install the Shoutcast plugin in my server.
I created a new user "A" and a new ShoutCast Server for that user. After that, i am able to log in as user (in the user panel) and configure the shoutcast, autodj, etc, as is supposed.
Then i create another user "B", and setup another shoutcast server for that user.
I can log in as user "B" and manage that ShoutCast, AutoDJ, etc.
But if i try to login as user "A" again, i'm unable of see or control any radio. The page only shows the error message: "Servercast Not available"
I think there is a bug in the creation process of the shoutcast, where if a new user is created with shoutcast access, only that will be able to manage the shoutcast rádio. In short: only the most recent user is able to create and manage the shoutcast.
I see a similar bug dated from some months ago in the Bug Tracking, but related with JS - i don't think is about that.
There is any report of this issue?
Thanks
68
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: User Panel Login removes port
« on: October 30, 2021, 11:00:38 AM »
I don't have that rule and still have the issue
69
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / User Panel Login removes port
« on: October 29, 2021, 08:46:47 AM »
Hello,
I notice that, when we try to login in a user control panel, CWP "remove" from the URL the port.
For instance:
https://hostname:2083/xxxxx
goes to
https://hostname/xxxx
this leads to a "Not Found" error.
If i try to add the port number manually, then he enters correctly.
I found that this happens when login in directly from the control panel page, or even the Admin page, in the "List accounts" section.
Does anyone knows how to fix or is a bug?
Thanks
I notice that, when we try to login in a user control panel, CWP "remove" from the URL the port.
For instance:
https://hostname:2083/xxxxx
goes to
https://hostname/xxxx
this leads to a "Not Found" error.
If i try to add the port number manually, then he enters correctly.
I found that this happens when login in directly from the control panel page, or even the Admin page, in the "List accounts" section.
Does anyone knows how to fix or is a bug?
Thanks
70
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / CWP File Manager - Javascript changed
« on: May 26, 2020, 09:39:31 AM »
Hi,
When editing files in a account under the CWP File Manager directly, the editor "removes" all the plus signs from the code when saving...
This can lead some files to be unusuable. When editing by FTP the problem doesn't appear.
I think there is some bug with the internal editor from CWP, where the sign "+" is removed from the code when saving.
Thanks
When editing files in a account under the CWP File Manager directly, the editor "removes" all the plus signs from the code when saving...
This can lead some files to be unusuable. When editing by FTP the problem doesn't appear.
I think there is some bug with the internal editor from CWP, where the sign "+" is removed from the code when saving.
Thanks
71
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / CWP backup error
« on: April 29, 2020, 12:52:08 AM »
hi,
CWP backup script (beta) is returning a error everytime is run by cron.
PHP Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /usr/local/cwpsrv/htdocs/resources/admin/addons/class_backupmanager.php on line 0
This happends since the last update done.
Thanks
CWP backup script (beta) is returning a error everytime is run by cron.
PHP Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /usr/local/cwpsrv/htdocs/resources/admin/addons/class_backupmanager.php on line 0
This happends since the last update done.
Thanks
72
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: CWP New backup (beta) - ionCube only for PHP 5
« on: April 25, 2020, 08:07:27 PM »
The issue is that "cron_newbackup.php" is encoded under a old version of ionCube (before PHP 5.x).
If you check the error log, the script outputs that error.
if you select in "PHP Version Switcher" the PHP version 5.6.40, the script runs fine.
If you update to a new version - PHP 7.x - then the script doesn't work.
PHP Version Switcher changes the PHP of CWP, that is where the cron_newbackup.php is running...
If you check the error log, the script outputs that error.
if you select in "PHP Version Switcher" the PHP version 5.6.40, the script runs fine.
If you update to a new version - PHP 7.x - then the script doesn't work.
PHP Version Switcher changes the PHP of CWP, that is where the cron_newbackup.php is running...
73
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: CWP New backup (beta) - ionCube only for PHP 5
« on: April 25, 2020, 01:17:42 PM »
Hi,
Yes, it is in the last version
CWPpro version: 0.9.8.962
Thanks
Yes, it is in the last version
CWPpro version: 0.9.8.962
Thanks
74
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: CWP / Softaculous bug with domains
« on: April 25, 2020, 01:16:55 PM »
Hi
thanks for the info
Just to provide more info, in /var/log/cwp/cwp_api.log i found out that the token is being logged as "invalid":
2020-04-25 13:13:16 Authorized detailaccount_list
2020-04-25 13:13:16 Valide
2020-04-25 13:13:16 key valido
2020-04-25 13:13:17 Invalid Token
Maybe can help debug from your end
thanks for the info
Just to provide more info, in /var/log/cwp/cwp_api.log i found out that the token is being logged as "invalid":
2020-04-25 13:13:16 Authorized detailaccount_list
2020-04-25 13:13:16 Valide
2020-04-25 13:13:16 key valido
2020-04-25 13:13:17 Invalid Token
Maybe can help debug from your end
75
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / CWP New backup (beta) - ionCube only for PHP 5
« on: April 25, 2020, 12:03:58 PM »
Hi,
I have notice that the New backup (beta) script is encoded with ionCube, but is only for the PHP 5.x version.
If the PHP of CWP is changed to a more recent version, the backup script will not work.
I think is safe to say that this script should be updated to a more recent version of PHP, since PHP 5.x are in EOL.
Also this have impact in the security of CWP from itself, since if we need to use this Backup Script, then CWP needs to be in PHP 5.x....
Thanks
I have notice that the New backup (beta) script is encoded with ionCube, but is only for the PHP 5.x version.
If the PHP of CWP is changed to a more recent version, the backup script will not work.
I think is safe to say that this script should be updated to a more recent version of PHP, since PHP 5.x are in EOL.
Also this have impact in the security of CWP from itself, since if we need to use this Backup Script, then CWP needs to be in PHP 5.x....
Thanks
