Author Topic: CWP 1.7 – What has actually been fixed? Community feedback  (Read 127 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline
*
CWP 1.7 – What has actually been fixed? Community feedback
« on: August 06, 2026, 09:44:28 PM »
Now that we've reached CWP 1.7, I'd like to understand the current state of the platform and compare experiences with other administrators.

After the silent transition from 0.9.8.12.44 to the new 1.x series, I experienced several issues that mainly affected the new UI. Looking through the forum, it seems I was not the only one.

These are the issues I have personally encountered:

- YUM Manager inaccessible or stuck.
- ModSecurity management not working from the UI.
- Firewall management issues.
- PHP Selector not working correctly.
- New Backup module (still marked as Beta) with poor email reporting:
    - notifications often don't specify whether the backup was local or remote;
    - there is no clear summary of which accounts completed successfully and which failed;
    - overall reporting is not sufficient for production environments.
- SSL certificate generation/management issues.
- Occasional problems with Roundcube.

The good news is that, on my servers, the backend itself has remained functional. Most operations continue to work correctly from the command line, which suggests that many of the regressions are related to the new UI rather than the underlying services.

What concerns me most is not a single bug, but the impact these updates had on production environments. A control panel used to manage production servers should prioritize stability and reliability. Releasing updates that introduce regressions into core administrative functions creates unnecessary operational risks, especially for administrators managing multiple servers.

Now that several updates have already been released and we're at version 1.7, I'd like to hear from other users.

- Which issues have actually been resolved?
- Which problems are you still experiencing?
- Is 1.7 stable enough for daily production use?
- Have you found any new regressions that haven't yet been discussed?
- Has the new Backup module become reliable, or are there still significant limitations?

I'm not interested in starting a complaint thread. My goal is to build an accurate picture of the current state of CWP 1.7 so that administrators can make informed decisions and developers can better understand which areas still need attention.

I appreciate any feedback from those running CWP in real production environments.

Offline
*
Re: CWP 1.7 – What has actually been fixed? Community feedback
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2026, 04:54:59 PM »
Nothing was Fixed, we dont know what are they trying to do, but the only thing i know they are breaking everything not even the text edit from filebrowser is functioning right. There are some new views but they are so confusing they seems to be done by a drug adict.

I dont think cwpro have much life in it they not fixing, they are breking, not even backups works now.

Offline
*
Re: CWP 1.7 – What has actually been fixed? Community feedback
« Reply #2 on: Today at 02:14:12 AM »
Thanks for sharing your experience. This is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping to get with this thread.

For me, the main issue is not whether a particular bug can eventually be fixed. The bigger problem is that, as a CWP user, I need to be able to trust the software I install on a production server.

I don't want a managed service, and I'm not asking CWP to manage my server for me. I chose a control panel because I want to administer the server myself, with a reliable UI and predictable behavior.

If something breaks, I can use the CLI and fix it myself. That's not the point. If I have to increasingly bypass the panel and work directly from the command line because I cannot trust what the next CWP update might change, then I have to seriously question what value the panel is providing.

The biggest problem right now is that I simply don't have enough information to make a safe decision about updating.

It is difficult to understand:

* which problems have actually been fixed;
* which problems are still known;
* which fixes may have introduced regressions;
* what has been tested before release;
* and whether an update is considered safe for production.

The changelog alone doesn't give me enough confidence to answer a very simple question:

**“Can I safely update my production server now?”**

At the moment, I don't know the answer to that question — and that is precisely what prevents me from updating.

I've already disabled silent updates on my production servers because I need to be the one deciding when an update is applied, after making sure my data is protected and the release is safe enough for my environment.

I don't expect CWP to be perfect. Bugs happen.

What I do expect is transparency, predictable updates, and enough technical information to make an informed decision as a system administrator.

If I install CWP, I want a control panel I can trust — not a managed service, and not a system where I have to guess whether the next update will break something.

Offline
*
I've already made up my mind; I'm not going back to that CWP panel. It's useless, and the support team treats people like idiots.
I've already started migrating my accounts