Thanks for sharing your experience. This is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping to get with this thread.
For me, the main issue is not whether a particular bug can eventually be fixed. The bigger problem is that, as a CWP user, I need to be able to trust the software I install on a production server.
I don't want a managed service, and I'm not asking CWP to manage my server for me. I chose a control panel because I want to administer the server myself, with a reliable UI and predictable behavior.
If something breaks, I can use the CLI and fix it myself. That's not the point. If I have to increasingly bypass the panel and work directly from the command line because I cannot trust what the next CWP update might change, then I have to seriously question what value the panel is providing.
The biggest problem right now is that I simply don't have enough information to make a safe decision about updating.
It is difficult to understand:
* which problems have actually been fixed;
* which problems are still known;
* which fixes may have introduced regressions;
* what has been tested before release;
* and whether an update is considered safe for production.
The changelog alone doesn't give me enough confidence to answer a very simple question:
**Can I safely update my production server now?**
At the moment, I don't know the answer to that question and that is precisely what prevents me from updating.
I've already disabled silent updates on my production servers because I need to be the one deciding when an update is applied, after making sure my data is protected and the release is safe enough for my environment.
I don't expect CWP to be perfect. Bugs happen.
What I do expect is transparency, predictable updates, and enough technical information to make an informed decision as a system administrator.
If I install CWP, I want a control panel I can trust not a managed service, and not a system where I have to guess whether the next update will break something.