Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
1
Information / Re: Is CWP still maintained?
« on: October 08, 2025, 06:23:49 AM »But if your not happy with CWP, maybe cPanel would suit your needs better.I don’t think going with a black-and-white mindset is the best way forward. Like I said, CWP isn’t “freeware,” no matter what the price tag is. If we keep thinking cheap means bad or that low cost equals poor communication, then we might as well shut things down and move on.
Your posts, @Starburst, basically prove my point about CWP’s communication. It’s been the community doing the talking and dealing with issues—not the CWP team.
Sure, being a sysadmin means reading a lot and keeping up with updates, but if you’re paying for a product, you expect certain things—like being kept in the loop about what’s happening with the platform that’s supposed to protect your business and income.
Big thanks, @Starburst, for the CSF fix here:
https://starburst.help/control-web-panel-cwp/control-web-panel-cwp-admin-tutorials/csf-firewall-error-oops-unable-to-download-no-host-option-provided/
.
Kinda bittersweet though—since this should’ve already been taken care of by CWP themselves.
2
Information / Is CWP still maintained?
« on: October 07, 2025, 02:38:21 PM »
Hello,
I have a PRO license of CWP and I have submitted several tickets in the past concerning Varnish not working with Almalinux 9. The initial one was in February 2025 and last one in September 2025.
Almalinux 9 is mentioned as supported by CWP and while I understand that it takes time to deal with everything CWP it is very hard for me to understand 10 months now and no change in the Varnish status.
Secondly, ConfigServer Services has announced the end of support for CSF as of 31st of August 2025 clearly stating that:
My question to the CWP team is: are you still maintaining it? As, by the looks of it, you don't.
Thank you.
P.S. Link to the ConfigServer Services (CSF) announcement: https://configserver.com/announcement/
I have a PRO license of CWP and I have submitted several tickets in the past concerning Varnish not working with Almalinux 9. The initial one was in February 2025 and last one in September 2025.
Almalinux 9 is mentioned as supported by CWP and while I understand that it takes time to deal with everything CWP it is very hard for me to understand 10 months now and no change in the Varnish status.
Secondly, ConfigServer Services has announced the end of support for CSF as of 31st of August 2025 clearly stating that:
Code: [Select]
In order to continue using any of our commercial software after the 31st of August, you must have updated the software to the latest version.
If you did not update the software, any of our commercial software products will cease to function and cannot be reactivated once the download and license servers are shut down.This time had passed with no reaction from the CWP team, again.My question to the CWP team is: are you still maintaining it? As, by the looks of it, you don't.
Thank you.
P.S. Link to the ConfigServer Services (CSF) announcement: https://configserver.com/announcement/
3
CentOS-WebPanel GUI / Re: CWP Pro proposing gdb-headless updates when not needed
« on: May 29, 2023, 09:45:49 AM »
For some reason I had both gdb-headless-8.2-19 and gdb-headless-8.2-18 installed so the CWP web GUI was probably seeing gdb-headless-8.2-18 present and was proposing to update it even though dnf was not reporting anything to be updated (didn't try yum).
I have uninstalled gdb-headless-8.2-18 and packages depending on it (which uninstalled gdb-headless-8.2-19 as well) then reinstalled the dependencies, which only installed gdb-headless-8.2-19, thus removing gdb-headless-8.2-18.
No more messages.
I have uninstalled gdb-headless-8.2-18 and packages depending on it (which uninstalled gdb-headless-8.2-19 as well) then reinstalled the dependencies, which only installed gdb-headless-8.2-19, thus removing gdb-headless-8.2-18.
No more messages.
4
CentOS-WebPanel GUI / CWP Pro proposing gdb-headless updates when not needed
« on: May 28, 2023, 09:22:27 AM »
Hello,
For a while now CWP proposes gdb-headless.x86_64 8.2-19.el8 to be updated while the system does not need that update. I am running Almalinux 8.8 (Sapphire Caracal).
Is there any way I can turn this notification off please?
Thank you in advance!
Nick
P.S. I have spent two minutes doing human puzzles; isn't it a bit too excessive?
For a while now CWP proposes gdb-headless.x86_64 8.2-19.el8 to be updated while the system does not need that update. I am running Almalinux 8.8 (Sapphire Caracal).
Is there any way I can turn this notification off please?
Thank you in advance!
Nick
P.S. I have spent two minutes doing human puzzles; isn't it a bit too excessive?
5
CentOS 7 Problems / Re: nGINX ONLY ssl_error_rx_record_too_long
« on: November 20, 2021, 06:25:45 AM »
Thanks for your reply.
My /etc/nginx/nginx.conf is in place and having all of the directives in place. SSL works normally on IPv4 only vhosts.
I have paid for a one time support and a CWP representative said that in this case a nGINX source recompile is needed however there was no further communication when I have asked for a guide or how to so that I do not break the CWP functionality... sometimes even this kind of support, paid support, is just of poor quality. Granted, it is only a few euro but still...
My /etc/nginx/nginx.conf is in place and having all of the directives in place. SSL works normally on IPv4 only vhosts.
I have paid for a one time support and a CWP representative said that in this case a nGINX source recompile is needed however there was no further communication when I have asked for a guide or how to so that I do not break the CWP functionality... sometimes even this kind of support, paid support, is just of poor quality. Granted, it is only a few euro but still...
6
CentOS 7 Problems / nGINX ONLY ssl_error_rx_record_too_long
« on: November 18, 2021, 05:38:32 AM »
Hello,
I am having an issue with a nGINX only site.
Since I have enabled IPv6, the SSL is not working anymore; Firefox reports: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long.
It would seem nGINX is not built with IPv6 support (--with-ipv6) nor TLS1.3.
Is there something I can do to fix this other than manually rebuild nGINX? Are there plans to add IPv6 support to CWP in the near future?
Thank you in advance!
Nick
I am having an issue with a nGINX only site.
Since I have enabled IPv6, the SSL is not working anymore; Firefox reports: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long.
It would seem nGINX is not built with IPv6 support (--with-ipv6) nor TLS1.3.
Is there something I can do to fix this other than manually rebuild nGINX? Are there plans to add IPv6 support to CWP in the near future?
Thank you in advance!
Nick
7
PHP / PHP-FPM7.4 How can I set php.ini files per domain name
« on: July 28, 2021, 07:03:51 AM »
Hello,
I want to use php-fpm and to set a php.ini per each domain name (each php-fpm session to be served according to the ini file it has, per domain name).
Currently, even though the domains I have are running php-fpm, they all use the same configuration file loaded from
Considering I have different users using the domain names, sometimes several domain names per user, is it possible to serve PHP-FPM from individual ini files for each domain name and if so where/what should I set up?
Thank you!
I want to use php-fpm and to set a php.ini per each domain name (each php-fpm session to be served according to the ini file it has, per domain name).
Currently, even though the domains I have are running php-fpm, they all use the same configuration file loaded from
Code: [Select]
/opt/alt/php-fpm74/usr/php/php.ini
Considering I have different users using the domain names, sometimes several domain names per user, is it possible to serve PHP-FPM from individual ini files for each domain name and if so where/what should I set up?
Thank you!
Pages: [1]
