Show Posts

61

E-Mail / gmail problem

« on: October 22, 2020, 02:35:38 PM »

I have two servers using cwp. #1 centos 7 #2 centos 8

#1 email header is good with gmail.

Quote

eturn-Path: <2019@lakeservers.com>
Delivered-To: 2015@lakeservers.com





Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [71.214.22.116])
   (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))

   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ED339DAF
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: LAKE SERVERS <2015@lakeservers.com>
From: Lake Servers <2019@lakeservers.com>
Subject: testt
Message-ID: <90ae98ca-b5fe-df2d-2d66-3dfaba86a6b8@lakeservers.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:26 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US

#2 centos 8 gmail header marked as spam

Quote

Return-Path: <info@smadirectory.com>
Delivered-To: 2015@lakeservers.com
Received: from server.rosinto.com (server.rosinto.com [45.79.19.73])
   (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.foreveryours.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB64F9D74
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [71.214.22.116])
   (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
    key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
   (No client certificate requested)
   by server.rosinto.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DAFC3E844
   for <2015@lakeservers.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: LAKE SERVERS <2015@lakeservers.com>
From: SMA Directory <info@smadirectory.com>
Subject: test
Message-ID: <379cb829-9c32-1aad-4058-2979a74b48a5@smadirectory.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:20:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------41DE0BD500F628F2784C5DBB"
Content-Language: en-US

I am going crazy trying to figure why one server is good and the other is bad.

62

SSL / Trustedhosts RED

« on: October 22, 2020, 01:52:36 PM »

All of my addon domains have a green icon for Trustedhosts

But one (rosinto.com) has red icon for trustedhosts and green icon for

TrustedHosts KeyTable v=DKIM1 v=spf1 Action
Red Green green green

63

Information / SoftException UID is smaller than min_uid

« on: October 10, 2020, 10:31:38 AM »

Im getting errors in my log file.

64

CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Advanced file editor incomplete directory

« on: October 01, 2020, 04:24:53 PM »

Directory is incomplete.

65

Installation / Preview websites without DNS

« on: October 01, 2020, 03:03:26 PM »

FYI

You can view your websites before changing dns.

ipx.x.x.x/~username/domaindirectory

Works really well and lets you get the new site up before changing dns.

66

CSF Firewall / Login to admin takes forever

« on: September 23, 2020, 12:20:02 PM »

I logged into admin okay but noticed that the dashboard said CSF not enabled. I clicked to enable and got a message that said CSF is not disabled. In the meantime, dashboard advised new update available. I updated from 1008 to 1009. Now login requires 5 minutes to get in.

ALSO csf is not working properly. I cannot do csf -x or -r or -f. Nothing happens.

Results from perl test of csf

Testing ip_tables/iptable_filter...FAILED [FATAL Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf to function
Testing ipt_LOG...FAILED [FATAL Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf to function
Testing ipt_multiport/xt_multiport...FAILED [FATAL Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf to function
Testing ipt_REJECT...FAILED [FATAL Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf to function
Testing ipt_state/xt_state...FAILED [FATAL Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf to function
Testing ipt_limit/xt_limit...FAILED [FATAL Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf to function
Testing ipt_recent...FAILED [Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for PORTFLOOD and PORTKNOCKING features
Testing xt_connlimit...FAILED [Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for CONNLIMIT feature
Testing ipt_owner/xt_owner...FAILED [Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for SMTP_BLOCK and UID/GID blocking features
Testing iptable_nat/ipt_REDIRECT...FAILED [Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for MESSENGER feature
Testing iptable_nat/ipt_DNAT...FAILED [Error: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?] - Required for csf.redirect feature

RESULT: csf will not function on this server due to FATAL errors from missing modules [6]
[r

67

Postfix / postfix force ipv4

« on: September 21, 2020, 02:18:23 PM »

inet_protocols = ipv4 will not allow restart postfix.

Update: I confused protocols with interfaces

Control Web Panel