Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1636
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: IPv6 keeps dissapearing
« on: December 13, 2020, 04:21:24 PM »
Did the custom template, after restarting, the IP vanished again.
So I hard coded them into the template.
Problem is, I can access the IPv6 OK, but others can't.
I tried to even disable csf/lfd and Mod_Security to see if there was a config problem.
There are no other firewalls in place.
Others still can not connect to the IPv6.
I'm out of ideas now.
So I hard coded them into the template.
Problem is, I can access the IPv6 OK, but others can't.
I tried to even disable csf/lfd and Mod_Security to see if there was a config problem.
There are no other firewalls in place.
Others still can not connect to the IPv6.
I'm out of ideas now.
1637
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: IPv6 keeps dissapearing
« on: December 13, 2020, 03:06:52 PM »well you need to create your own custom template and apply it to your user domains, in this way changes will be retained.
http://wiki.centos-webpanel.com/webservers-vhost-templates
I see "%ip%:%apache_port%"
Where can I find what to put to IPv6?
Would it be - [%ipv6%]:%apache_port%
1638
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / IPv6 keeps dissapearing
« on: December 12, 2020, 09:44:21 PM »
It happened today again... When I checked the website with a browser, it went to the default page.
Looked at the vhost conf files, and the IPv6 that was manually entered was GONE, AGAIN.
Running CWPpro 0.9.8.1026 on CentOS 8.3.2011
Looked at the vhost conf files, and the IPv6 that was manually entered was GONE, AGAIN.
Running CWPpro 0.9.8.1026 on CentOS 8.3.2011
1639
Information / Re: Now that CentOS is on a dead end path...
« on: December 12, 2020, 09:37:34 PM »
cloudlinux is not an easy install. There are lots of steps to get it up and running. Linode, DO, Vultr etc etc do not offer cloudlinux as a standard VPS o/s.
But allot do other Custom ISO uploads like DO, Vultr, etc.
Vultr offers both CentOS 8 and CentOS Stream currently, besides the above.
From what I've heard they are waiting and seeing what happens.
1640
Information / Re: Now that CentOS is on a dead end path...
« on: December 11, 2020, 10:31:21 PM »well don't worry we'll support centos 8 stream
Awesome to hear that, I wonder how stable Centos Stream will wind up being.
I had just switched everything over to CentOS 8 also.
As for the constant Free, I've been using Debian on my personal stuff since the late 90's...
And I do remember when Redhat was free.
https://rockylinux.org/ is hopefully coming out sooner than later, From the founder of CentOS.
Yea, Rocky Linux just announced their start when RedHat announced CentOS. So did CloudLinux, which has a leg up, since they already have a modified version of RedHat.
Knew something was gonna happen when IBM bought RedHat, but thought it would stay there.
With how long FreeBSD has been around, you would think it would have a control panel other than Webmin though.
Plesk and ISPConfig supports Debian/Ubuntu, but cPanel only supports CentOS. So it's going to be interesting.
1641
Information / Re: Now that CentOS is on a dead end path...
« on: December 11, 2020, 08:47:32 PM »
CWP works on CentOS Stream 8 OK.
CentOS 7 isn't fully EOL until 2024.
CloudLinux is talking about releasing a free version also based on RHEL.
Go figure all this happened 2 weeks after we migrated over to CentOS 8.
Which just had a major dot release from 8.2.2004 to 8.3.2003.
This isn't the first time RedHat has done this.
RedHat use to be a free version of Linux, then I think back in 2002 they went paid, and release Fedora as the free version.
Or you could use Mandrake, which went to some other name due to some stupid lawsuit.
Only constant with Free Linux distros has been FreeBSD. All others have come and gone.
CentOS 7 isn't fully EOL until 2024.
CloudLinux is talking about releasing a free version also based on RHEL.
Go figure all this happened 2 weeks after we migrated over to CentOS 8.
Which just had a major dot release from 8.2.2004 to 8.3.2003.
This isn't the first time RedHat has done this.
RedHat use to be a free version of Linux, then I think back in 2002 they went paid, and release Fedora as the free version.
Or you could use Mandrake, which went to some other name due to some stupid lawsuit.
Only constant with Free Linux distros has been FreeBSD. All others have come and gone.
1642
Information / Re: How enabled and configure ipv6 for work with apache / cwp / centos 7 & 8
« on: December 11, 2020, 08:39:08 PM »Yes, all its ok, the person who think in ipv6...its for kill...hehehe.QuoteIn the ifcfg-eth0 file I had to add:This is just that you was need for work with ipv6, config in ifcfg-eth0, only in this.
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2605:a140:2045:8941::2 2605:a140:2045:8941::3 2605:a140:2045:8941::4 2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d"
(Just to start)
In the vhost files, with /64 I think its sufficient for work.
I'm very glad it works for you, and if I could be of help, all the better.
For some reason, if the address isn't listed there, the server doesn't ressond to it, and in turn CWP doesn't.
1643
Updates / Re: MariaDB update failed
« on: December 11, 2020, 05:07:18 AM »
Ref.: https://www.mysterydata.com/update-upgrade-to-mariadb-10-4-on-vestacp-cwp-centos-7/
Go thru the steps again, make sure NOT to miss one or else it will mess everything up.
Especially Step 2. You want to follow the 2nd step labeled "For MariaDB 10.0/10.1/10.2/10.3 :", and NOT the 1st one.
I've used this guide on multiple servers, never had a problem.
If it still doesn't work. I agree with Igor, you'll have to have CWP support look at it.
CentOS 8 is a little easier, it has 10.4 by default.
You create the repo for 10.5, run dnf update and BAM that's it.
Go thru the steps again, make sure NOT to miss one or else it will mess everything up.
Especially Step 2. You want to follow the 2nd step labeled "For MariaDB 10.0/10.1/10.2/10.3 :", and NOT the 1st one.
I've used this guide on multiple servers, never had a problem.
If it still doesn't work. I agree with Igor, you'll have to have CWP support look at it.
CentOS 8 is a little easier, it has 10.4 by default.
You create the repo for 10.5, run dnf update and BAM that's it.
1644
Information / Re: How enabled and configure ipv6 for work with apache / cwp / centos 7 & 8
« on: December 11, 2020, 04:53:30 AM »
I want to kill the person who thought up IPv6...
So the IPv6 allocation is 2605:a140:2045:8941::1/64
Now normally with IPv4 the system is smart enough to understand (the whole network range) that it goes from 2605:a140:2045:8941::1 to 2605:a140:2045:8941::ffff
But NO. Doesn't seem to do that with IPv6, unless I missed some simple step.
And if I did, please let me know!
In the ifcfg-eth0 file I had to add:
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2605:a140:2045:8941::2 2605:a140:2045:8941::3 2605:a140:2045:8941::4 2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d"
(Just to start)
Once I did, BAM, it worked.
Running CWPpro 0.9.8.1026 on CentOS 8.3.2011
(Yes, we just finished migrating 2 weeks ago - Fraking IBM/RedHat)
So the IPv6 allocation is 2605:a140:2045:8941::1/64
Now normally with IPv4 the system is smart enough to understand (the whole network range) that it goes from 2605:a140:2045:8941::1 to 2605:a140:2045:8941::ffff
But NO. Doesn't seem to do that with IPv6, unless I missed some simple step.
And if I did, please let me know!
In the ifcfg-eth0 file I had to add:
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2605:a140:2045:8941::2 2605:a140:2045:8941::3 2605:a140:2045:8941::4 2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d"
(Just to start)
Once I did, BAM, it worked.
Running CWPpro 0.9.8.1026 on CentOS 8.3.2011
(Yes, we just finished migrating 2 weeks ago - Fraking IBM/RedHat)
1645
CentOS-WebPanel GUI / Re: I can't get CWP started up after rebooting the VPS
« on: December 10, 2020, 02:55:31 AM »
Do you have a snapshot your can restore to?
That sounds like your best bet.
Did you install/activate ClamAV and anti-spam via CWP?
That sounds like your best bet.
Did you install/activate ClamAV and anti-spam via CWP?
1646
Information / Re: How enabled and configure ipv6 for work with apache / cwp / centos 7 & 8
« on: December 10, 2020, 02:41:12 AM »
@Wonder did everything you suggested, but still not working.
I have a /64 allocation, and used a tool for a certain IP (Just copied the IPv4 into the IPv6 - lol)
Specified that IP [2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d]:80 and :443
You have the port's outside the IP bracket.
Created the AAAA record.
Restarted Apache.
But when I try to connect, just using the IP [2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d], it isn't working.
Also when I look at the .conf files, the IPv6 is gone.
Do I need to rebuild the webserver?
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
I have a /64 allocation, and used a tool for a certain IP (Just copied the IPv4 into the IPv6 - lol)
Specified that IP [2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d]:80 and :443
You have the port's outside the IP bracket.
Created the AAAA record.
Restarted Apache.
But when I try to connect, just using the IP [2605:a140:2045:8941:0:30:40b7:f60d], it isn't working.
Also when I look at the .conf files, the IPv6 is gone.
Do I need to rebuild the webserver?
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
1647
Installation / Re: CentOS Stream Support
« on: December 09, 2020, 11:33:13 PM »till 2024 there is a long time and till then many things can and will change for sure its the same as with any other upgrade, for example, centos 6 to centos 7. However, CWP still recommends CentOS 7.
CloudLinux is talking about releasing a free version that will be based on the main RHEL modules.
We will have to see.
CentOS 8 just had a pretty good update yesterday from 8.2.2004 to 8.3.2011
Over 300 packages updated.
1648
Installation / Re: CentOS Stream Support
« on: December 09, 2020, 11:31:35 PM »This is a REALLY big deal. I've been reading up on this since last night. Here are the big highlights that everyone needs to understand.
- CentOS is essentially becoming beta software. It will no longer carry the reliability and stability it has in past years.
- CentOS 7 will be supported until 2024.
- CentOS 8 will be only supported until Dec 2021 (yes, not a typo)
Lots of good reading on Reddit on the topic...
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/k95dt7/centos_project_shifts_focus_to_centos_stream/
https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/k95w7b/centos_moving_to_a_rolling_release_model_will_no/
https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/k9pd39/the_centos_project_just_committed_suicide/
Sounds like the current CentOS community will be jumping ship to Debian, Ubuntu or FreeBSD. There is a possible CentOS fork in the future, also.
I'll be unfortunately leaving CWP Pro with this CentOS announcement and shiting towards Debian and ISPManager. It's a shame because I really liked CWP Pro.
I hate the very short notice for the EOL for CentOS 8 of December 2021.
We just finished migrating from 7 to 8.
RedHat hasn't said what's going to happen to Fedora, but guessing that's ending also, since now Stream is taking it's place as a per-curser to the main RedHat build.
Stream is NOT as stable as CentOS by a long shot.
https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
1649
E-Mail / Re: Email sending not working after install
« on: December 09, 2020, 04:47:43 AM »
Do you have a FQDN for your server?
From those errors, I would take a look at your hostname to make sure it has a valid A record.
Also check:
/etc/hosts (This will have your hostname and the main IP of the server)
/etc/hostname (This should just be the name list srv1.domain.tld)
Also running that from the cli command, it doesn't ask for a UN/PW like a normal mailbox.
From those errors, I would take a look at your hostname to make sure it has a valid A record.
Also check:
/etc/hosts (This will have your hostname and the main IP of the server)
/etc/hostname (This should just be the name list srv1.domain.tld)
Also running that from the cli command, it doesn't ask for a UN/PW like a normal mailbox.
1650
Information / Re: Did CWP support IPV6?
« on: December 09, 2020, 04:43:01 AM »Finally, I solved the problem and create a little guide for configure ipv6 and enabled in apache:
http://forum.centos-webpanel.com/index.php?topic=9935.0
Thank you @Wonder for taking the time and posting that.
