Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - venty

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 28
46
Hi,

I built a mail server in the CWP, then restarted all mail servers....

https://prnt.sc/oSaQTIuflGO9

https://prnt.sc/oSaQTIuflGO9

I got the following error: Failed to restart cbpolicyd.service: Unit cbpolicyd.service not found.

https://prnt.sc/dveo9EHxBIau

Pls, help....

BR
Venty


47
Installation / Hidden processes...
« on: March 03, 2025, 04:30:09 AM »
Hi,

CWP on AlmaLinux 8/9

Please look at the pictures:

https://prnt.sc/UIdzbfGYEHZg

https://prnt.sc/xxeOnFoYtp42

I choose, but the status is always the same, please help?


BR
Venty

48
Hi,

I . Many thanks for this article :

https://starburst.help/control-web-panel-cwp/control-web-panel-cwp-admin-tutorials/ioncube-error-after-building-php-8-3-with-cwp-on-almalinux-8-9/

ionCube Error after building PHP 8.3 with CWP on AlmaLinux 8/9

Please look at the picture: https://prnt.sc/UIdzbfGYEHZg

1. I assume unzipping the server, but please recommend where and how exactly?
2. Something seems to be missing, and below another missing...

I I . Is it possible in advance, before the first compilation of PHP 8.3(+FPM PHP), to check the versions of ionCube Loaders and if they are not the latest, to download the latest ionCube Loaders and change them before compiling PHP?

Thanks in advance!


BR
Venty

49
Information / Re: Content management systems....
« on: February 26, 2025, 07:25:04 AM »
What is your question ?

Hi,

thank you very much...

I question whether there are any recommendations, security requirements, etc. when working with these CMS and CWP... We use Alma Linux 9....

Something to read, to apply ....

Thanks in advance!

BR
Venty


51
Information / Content management systems....
« on: February 25, 2025, 08:03:34 PM »
Hi,

CWP and Content management systems - WordPress, Joomla, etc... features, security...>

Thanks in advance!

BR
Venty

52
Installation / Re: ...server under AL9?
« on: February 25, 2025, 07:36:30 PM »
For the
Quote
Repository 'mariadb' is missing name in configuration, using id.

Check the MariaDB.repo file.

It should look something like:

Quote
[mariadb]
name = MariaDB
baseurl = https://rpm.mariadb.org/10.11/rhel/$releasever/$basearch
gpgkey = https://rpm.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB
gpgcheck = 1

And then when you run a dnf clean all, it will usually show x file removed.

10.11.11 is the current version, and the 10.11 is a LTS (5 year) supported version.

Hi.

Yes, the  MariaDB.repo file looks exactly like this...

File: /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo
Light Mode
# MariaDB 10.11 RedHatEnterpriseLinux списък с хранилища - създаден 2025-02-25 16:00 UTC
# https://mariadb.org/download/
[mariadb]
име = MariaDB
# rpm.mariadb.org е динамично огледало, ако предпочитаното от вас огледало е офлайн. Вижте https://mariadb.org/mirrorbits/ за подробности.
# baseurl = https://rpm.mariadb.org/10.11/rhel/$releasever/$basearch
baseurl = https://mirrors.neterra.net/MariaDB/yum/10.11/rhel/$releasever/$basearch
# gpgkey = https://rpm.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB
gpgkey = https://mirrors.neterra.net/MariaDB/yum/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB
gpgcheck = 1

My question is that when I ran the command, it returned two lines as a result:

Repository 'mariadb' is missing name in configuration, using id.
70 files removed

BR
venty

53
Installation / Re: ...server under AL9?
« on: February 25, 2025, 04:37:57 PM »
Hi,

thank you very much..., to upgrade MariaDB, I followed:

https://kb.starburstservices.com/control-web-panel-cwp/control-web-panel-cwp-admin-tutorials/upgrade-mariadb-10-x-to-10-11-with-cwp-on-almalinux-9/

When I executed step 4 and the command dnf clean all . I got the result:

Repository 'mariadb' is missing name in configuration, using id.
70 files removed

is this normal?

And by the way I upgraded to MariaDB 10.11.11, I guess a good choice?

Thanks in advance!

BR
Venty

54
I would suggest you look here:
https://www.awsmonster.com/how-to-secure-postfixdovecot-on-cwp

Hi,

thank you very much...

I looked at the manual, just please clarify - in etc/postfix/main.cf I have the following restriction:

# rules restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unknown_client

is it appropriate to look like this:

# rules restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_unknown_client_hostname

Thanks in advance!

BR
Venty

55
Suggestions / Re: :):):) Comodo WAF rules update required :):):)
« on: February 20, 2025, 10:10:04 AM »
The only thing left is to:

nano crs-setup.conf

Code: [Select]
# SecDefaultAction "phase:1,log,auditlog,pass"
# SecDefaultAction "phase:2,log,auditlog,pass"


Uncomment:

Code: [Select]
SecDefaultAction "phase:1,log,auditlog,deny,status:403"
SecDefaultAction "phase:2,log,auditlog,deny,status:403"


Hi,

thank you very much....

and that's all, will they update?

BR
Venty

56
FYI.  You are not going to get a response from postfix on 465 using telnet.  465 requires SSL authentication.  To test it, you must use openssl.

Code: [Select]
openssl s_client -connect localhost:465
If you receive an appropriate response, then everything should be working, we need to look externally.  If you do not get a response from posix, please check /etc/postfix/master.cf and make sure port 465 is indeed enabled.


Hi,

thank you very much, it worked :)

Please take a look at the following restrictions in Postfix:
# rules restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unknown_client
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain
# uncomment for realtime black list checks
# ,reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
# ,reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
# ,reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net
smtpd_helo_required = yes
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
disable_vrfy_command = yes
smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining

are they adequate?

BR
Venty

57
Postfix / Re: ESMTP Postfix for SSL, port 465 is missing...
« on: February 17, 2025, 03:09:02 PM »
Thought we covered this ground in another of your threads? Not the case?

Hi,

Please tell me what the topic is...?

I still don't have a solution with SSL sending and receiving mail????

I read and did what???

BR

Venty

58
Postfix / Re: ESMTP Postfix for SSL, port 465 is missing...
« on: February 17, 2025, 12:38:39 PM »
Hi,

Hi,
I am using Alma Linux 9, set it up according to the settings.., but ESMTP Postfix for SSL, port 465 is missing, the port is open, but ::

https://prnt.sc/Y8iYYDuJ8t7r

Hi,
I am using Alma Linux 9, I have configured it according to the settings and no.., but ESMTP Postfix for SSL, port 465 is missing, the port is open, but ::

https://prnt.sc/Y8iYYDuJ8t7r

...and messages are not received on port 995, SSL?

BR
Venty


???

59
Installation / the snapshot or to do a new installation?
« on: February 16, 2025, 04:57:13 PM »
Hi,

please give your opinion - a snapshot of the current state of the server was taken and then a number of applications and settings were tested -- what is the best thing to do next - to revert to the state at the time of the snapshot or to do a new installation?

Which is better?

BR
Venty

60
Installation / Re: DNS records for pop, cpanel....
« on: February 16, 2025, 04:53:50 PM »
CNAME   *         domain.com

Is a catch all solution

Hi,

CNAME   *         domain.com or *      A IP ???


MX ? have any special features?

BR
Venty

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 28