Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
76
Installation / Re: Now what
« on: June 08, 2024, 12:43:12 PM »
You have misunderstood the grammar syntax. It says out of the three distros Rocky Linux is recommended. But overall, it says centos 7 minimal in system requirements (step 2) recommended.
77
Installation / Re: Now what
« on: June 05, 2024, 01:28:57 AM »Problem is they have 2 websites, centos-webpanel.com is outdated with that information.
Doesn't help they mention that CentOS 7 MINIMAL is recommended, which only means to use that and not the Network or DVD versions.
But the New control-webpanel.com has AlmaLinux 8 as the recommended version.
That was quoted from the new website my friend, not the old website.
78
Installation / Now what
« on: June 04, 2024, 10:28:39 PM »
So here we are in June 2024 just days away from EOL centos 7. And the CWP installation has this to say:
Quote
Please note that currently we still recommend CentOS 7 as the best version to get installed as it also provides our CWP Secure Kernel which is very important for server security and especially for shared web hosting servers.
79
Installation / Re: Y2K deja vu
« on: May 09, 2024, 12:20:28 AM »I doubt there will be any future CentOS Stream support, since it is now a beta operating system.
AlmaLinux is a production (aka primetime) ready OS, that even has FIPS Certification.
https://control-webpanel.com/installation-instructions#step4
"Installer for CentOS 8/stream, Alma Linux, and Rocky Linux (recommended)"
Once on AlmaLinux 8, you can use ELevate to upgrade to AlmaLinux 9.
No 'band-aid'
Both steps 3 and 4 recommend centos 7 minimal. https://control-webpanel.com/installation-instructions#step2
80
Installation / Re: Y2K deja vu
« on: May 08, 2024, 12:12:24 PM »
Moving to anything other than centos 9 is futile. My prediction is that cwp for centos9 wont happen for at least a year and more likely 2. By the time it happens, centos 10 will be out.
81
Installation / Re: Y2K deja vu
« on: May 08, 2024, 12:09:15 PM »No, this has been covered several times in other threads.
Yes, CentOS 7 is EOL in June.
Allot of repos have already stopped or are stopping support.
Quote
What you are saying about other distros is False.What exactly did I say that was false?
Quote
AlmaLinux 8 has been running successfully, and is currently the recommended OS.Last time I looked....2 days ago....centos7 was still the recommended OS
Rocky does have some missing packages, and it's recommended.
Quote
AlmaLinux also have an ELevate program to go from CentOS 7 to AlmaLinux 8.Admirable......but is this is just a bandaid. And we all know what happens when we rip the bandaid off.
Quote
CWP also has a beta CWP out for AlmaLinux 9.Again, supports my position that we are in a Y2K position.......waiting to see what happens instead of being prepared.
82
Installation / Y2K deja vu
« on: May 06, 2024, 03:16:04 PM »
centos 7 EOL is June 2024.
Centos 8 Dec 2021.
Is this another Y2K scenario where no one knows what is going to happen at midnight?
I don't see any major announcements about the future of CWP without the recommended Centos7 installation. All of the other centos 8 distros are really not ready for prime time as they say.
I see storm clouds on the horizon for CWP. Or maybe it is a dust cloud from the stampede of users leaving?
Centos 8 Dec 2021.
Is this another Y2K scenario where no one knows what is going to happen at midnight?
I don't see any major announcements about the future of CWP without the recommended Centos7 installation. All of the other centos 8 distros are really not ready for prime time as they say.
I see storm clouds on the horizon for CWP. Or maybe it is a dust cloud from the stampede of users leaving?
83
Information / Re: DNSSEC
« on: April 16, 2024, 05:54:18 PM »
Problem was that my server was not configured for DNSSEC
84
Information / DNSSEC
« on: April 16, 2024, 02:13:29 PM »
Yesterday I updated my DNS servers at my registry (name.com). I expected my website to resolve rather quickly as it did in the past. But after 48 hours still no joy. After a lot of research, I learned that the problem was my registry created a new DNSSEC record by default. Sneaky I agree.
So I quickly deleted the dnssec record at my registry and got my website back.
There are a lot of pros and cons about this new security measure, the biggest of which is a complete shutdown of your website should you create a new record before deleting the old record. Chaos will surely prevail should you make this mistake.
Any discussion?
So I quickly deleted the dnssec record at my registry and got my website back.
There are a lot of pros and cons about this new security measure, the biggest of which is a complete shutdown of your website should you create a new record before deleting the old record. Chaos will surely prevail should you make this mistake.
Any discussion?
85
E-Mail / Email filters
« on: January 16, 2024, 05:52:27 PM »
Im playing around with filters and I have a few questions
- Diff between discard with message and delete
- Reply with message, what goes in the "email addresses" field
- What is "how often send messages"?
86
E-Mail / Re: Issues with "ALL" Gmail
« on: December 22, 2023, 12:11:36 PM »admin/index.php?module=dkim
/admin/index.php?module=spf
/admin/index.php?module=postfix_manager
Check the box to enable for all new accounts.
Yes I know this and is done already but every email I send from my server to gmail get bounced with that message. So there is n9othing in spf/dkim config to change this. Been through the settings a hundred times now.
If you are using the DNS management where your domains are registered, configuring dkim spf will have no effect unless you modifiy dns record there.
87
CentOS 8 Problems / Re: How to fix roundcube mail server 403 forbidden error
« on: November 16, 2023, 02:35:09 PM »
I have had onging issues with RC for years. A recurring issue is in certain email accounts, can not save to send box. This is true in thunderbird and webmail both. I get permission error in webmail. But just for certain email accounts. Never did figure it out.
88
Information / Re: Offical ipv6 Support?
« on: July 27, 2023, 09:56:10 PM »And yet their modems come with default ip4 enabled and ipv6 disabled. Why are they still using ip4 if ipv6 is widespread. The answer is quite simple.And a simple g search will reveal that your definition of "widespread ipv6 use" amounts to somewhere between 21 and 30%. That would sure be widespread if it was the black plague, but for webservers.......not even close.. I think Microsoft webservers are at the same percentages. Does that mean it's widespread? I don't think so....but the folks in Seattle might.
Give it up newbie.
All your arguments keep being disproven.
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3254575/what-is-ipv6-and-why-aren-t-we-there-yet.html#:~:text=Who%20is%20deploying%20IPv6%3F,mobile%20networks%20leading%20the%20charge.
"As of March 2022, according to Google, the IPv6 adoption rate globally is around 34%, but in the U.S. it’s at about 46%.
Carrier networks and ISPs have been the first group to start deploying IPv6 on their networks, with mobile networks leading the charge.
For example, T-Mobile USA has more than 90% of its traffic going over IPv6 as of March 2002, with Verizon Wireless close behind at 82.63%. Comcast and AT&T have their networks at 70% and 73%, respectively"
I would call 70%-90% a 'widespread' use of IPv6.
Quote
However, the transition to IPv6-only operation brings specific challenges, one of which is that some DNS zones are only served by IPv4-only authoritative servers. This can cause problems for IPv6-only iterative resolvers as they do not have access to an IPv4 network and may be unable to resolve these DNS zones.Feb 9, 2023
89
Information / Re: Offical ipv6 Support?
« on: July 27, 2023, 09:47:12 PM »
No not a system administrator. But I have been maintaining all of those websites every since trying to keep them at critical mass. Been thru hundreds of hosts over the years and experienced every possible issue imaginable and having to find solutions with a company of one employee. It's been a very long 27 years. I can write an encyclopedia with the knowledge I have about the internets evolution and the companies that haven risen only to crash and burn in a spectacular display of chaos and confusion.
Bill Gates wasnt/isnt a network administrator either. Lots of people going around calling themselves network administrators these days. Some even have certifications and still no clue what they are doing.
People like me have an small amount of information about everything, while others have a tremendous amount of information about just one thing. To each his own. I dont need to reinvent the wheel, I just need to drive the wagon.
Bill Gates wasnt/isnt a network administrator either. Lots of people going around calling themselves network administrators these days. Some even have certifications and still no clue what they are doing.
People like me have an small amount of information about everything, while others have a tremendous amount of information about just one thing. To each his own. I dont need to reinvent the wheel, I just need to drive the wagon.
90
Information / Re: Offical ipv6 Support?
« on: July 27, 2023, 08:21:52 PM »
And a simple g search will reveal that your definition of "widespread ipv6 use" amounts to somewhere between 21 and 30%. That would sure be widespread if it was the black plague, but for webservers.......not even close.. I think Microsoft webservers are at the same percentages. Does that mean it's widespread? I don't think so....but the folks in Seattle might.
