Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
1
Information / Re: Hot link protection ??
« on: August 26, 2019, 11:59:17 AM »Hi, you can use .htaccess for that. Just copy the rules from CPanel or other serverAny working example please?
2
SSL / Re: Let's Encrypt AutoSSL SOLVED
« on: August 13, 2019, 03:43:21 AM »
@amqshaker:::
I have tried this but SSL is not installed for www.
I have tried this but SSL is not installed for www.
3
SSL / AutoSSl for www.example.com
« on: August 10, 2019, 10:26:12 PM »
I have created a new account with a domain name. While i was doing that left the field untick "AutoSSL: Domain must be pointed to the server". thought I will configure after my website setup. Later I created ssl using AutoSSL in SSL Certificates manager.
Everything was fine. I didnt check for the alias.
But when I was creating .htaccess file for website then I noticed that SSL was not installed for www.
Then I checked the forum.And found that www was not pointing to the server IP in A record. Deleted the CNAME for www and created the A record. And tried to re-create the SSl via AutoSSl. But same thing happened. SSL is not installed for www.
What is the solution?
Also I have a Comodo dv SSl for www.example.com & example.com. But while generating CSR there is no instruction where to put aliases, so that CSR can be generated for www.example.com & example.com.
Any help guys?
Everything was fine. I didnt check for the alias.
But when I was creating .htaccess file for website then I noticed that SSL was not installed for www.
Then I checked the forum.And found that www was not pointing to the server IP in A record. Deleted the CNAME for www and created the A record. And tried to re-create the SSl via AutoSSl. But same thing happened. SSL is not installed for www.
What is the solution?
Also I have a Comodo dv SSl for www.example.com & example.com. But while generating CSR there is no instruction where to put aliases, so that CSR can be generated for www.example.com & example.com.
Any help guys?
4
Information / Hot link protection ??
« on: August 09, 2019, 09:01:41 PM »
" Hotlink protection prevents other websites from directly linking to files (as specified below) on your website. Other sites will still be able to link to any file type that you don’t specify below (ie. html files). An example of hotlinking would be using a <img> tag to display an image from your site from somewhere else on the net. "
- is this feature available in CWP?
- if not any possible way to implement in the server.
Thanks.
- is this feature available in CWP?
- if not any possible way to implement in the server.
Thanks.
5
DKIM / DKIM record is not accepting by Bind
« on: August 06, 2019, 10:13:56 AM »
When we setup a server by default dkim entry comes with the selector- "default". But when I want to use a separate mail server (in my case I'm using mail-in-a-box server) then I need to put another txt (dkim) record with "mail._domainkey" in cwp. but when I am doing the entry it says
"Error
There is some error with the configuration, please check and update"
if I add directly from the file (/var/named/example.com.db) then bind server stops working.
says
" dns_rdata_fromtext: /var/named/example.com.db:26: syntax error "
Already tried to add another dkim key with the selector"mail"
but nothing is working.
After some research:
Can not enter any dkim record which is more than 255 characters.
Any solution?
DKIM record (2048 bit) which is more than 255 characters.
"Error
There is some error with the configuration, please check and update"
if I add directly from the file (/var/named/example.com.db) then bind server stops working.
says
" dns_rdata_fromtext: /var/named/example.com.db:26: syntax error "
Already tried to add another dkim key with the selector"mail"
but nothing is working.
After some research:
Can not enter any dkim record which is more than 255 characters.
Any solution?
DKIM record (2048 bit) which is more than 255 characters.
6
DNS / Text record length problem
« on: August 06, 2019, 08:54:11 AM »
Can not enter any txt record which is more than 255 characters?
Any solution?
Basically I want to add a DKIM record (2048 bit) which is more than 255 characters.
Any solution?
Basically I want to add a DKIM record (2048 bit) which is more than 255 characters.
7
DNS / How to add a dkim entry with selector "mail"?
« on: August 06, 2019, 02:29:43 AM »
When we setup a server by default dkim entry comes with the selector- "default". But when I want to use a separate mail server (in my case I'm using mail-in-a-box server) then I need to put another txt (dkim) record with "mail._domainkey" in cwp. but when i am doing the entry it says
"Error
There is some error with the configuration, please check and update"
if I add directly from the file (/var/named/example.com.db) then bind server stops working.
says
" dns_rdata_fromtext: /var/named/example.com.db:26: syntax error "
Already tried to add another dkim key with the selector"mail"
but nothing is working.
Need help.
thanks
"Error
There is some error with the configuration, please check and update"
if I add directly from the file (/var/named/example.com.db) then bind server stops working.
says
" dns_rdata_fromtext: /var/named/example.com.db:26: syntax error "
Already tried to add another dkim key with the selector"mail"
but nothing is working.
Need help.
thanks
8
Postfix / Re: spam issue: Need help regarding mail server
« on: May 06, 2019, 12:18:41 PM »
Mail is being received. But in Spam/Junk folder
9
Postfix / Re: spam issue: Need help regarding mail server
« on: May 05, 2019, 04:51:38 AM »
@Netino
Regarding URIBL_BLOCKED issue. I saw that most of the emails which are ended in Inbox have the same. You can see that my 2nd domain is delivering mails to inbox which has same regarding DNS query. Hope this is not a problem. Though I'm not sure..
Regarding Senderscore, yes you are right that volume sender class is very low.
test result: http://oi65.tinypic.com/21meluo.jpg
I have purchased a new domain and integrated it in the vps. Also I bought the vps last month. Is it really effecting the mail delivery?
Any suggestion?
Thanks...
Regarding URIBL_BLOCKED issue. I saw that most of the emails which are ended in Inbox have the same. You can see that my 2nd domain is delivering mails to inbox which has same regarding DNS query. Hope this is not a problem. Though I'm not sure..
Regarding Senderscore, yes you are right that volume sender class is very low.
test result: http://oi65.tinypic.com/21meluo.jpg
I have purchased a new domain and integrated it in the vps. Also I bought the vps last month. Is it really effecting the mail delivery?
Any suggestion?
Thanks...
10
Postfix / Re: spam issue: Need help regarding mail server
« on: May 05, 2019, 04:28:40 AM »
@Netino: Ok.. Here is the source of a mail sent from my vps to hotmail which was delivered to Junk...
Code: [Select]
Received: from DB5EUR03HT025.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2603:1006:b01:c::18) by BMXPR01MB3718.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM with HTTPS
via BMXPR01CA0032.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Sun, 5 May 2019 04:11:14 +0000
Received: from DB5EUXR03FT022.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.152.20.55) by DB5EUXR03HT025.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.152.21.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1835.13; Sun, 5 May
2019 04:11:13 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 7X.XXX.XX.29)
smtp.mailfrom=jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com; hotmail.com; dkim=pass (signature was
verified) header.d=jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com;hotmail.com; dmarc=pass action=none
header.from=jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com
designates 7X.XXX.XX.29 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=7X.XXX.XX.29; helo=xx-01.exxtxxsxer.com;
Received: from xx-01.exxtxxsxer.com (7X.XXX.XX.29) by
DB5EUXR03FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.20.171) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id
15.20.1856.11 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 5 May 2019 04:11:13 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:D13592CADF2353FCB4DD97D51C92B054D65317A89D978863C8BC56EBFBFE1A6F;UpperCasedChecksum:E91DE36F48136F28E546EA532B349497682CAF231FA22E2E342727814366430B;SizeAsReceived:976;Count:12
Received: from localhost (xx-01.exxtxxsxer.com [127.0.0.1])
by xx-01.exxtxxsxer.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2C198802
for <debxxxxx.maxxx@hotmail.com>; Sun, 5 May 2019 06:11:13 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com;
s=default; t=1557029473;
bh=g1hjDhQalhfUcKQi6hgJKTM7BqzidivN5X5AN8tNWfE=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject;
b=rBfhXsJtrms8VH0uY2rEbj9I24NE63VkcaX35ErQtouNJRmkqjoqgwiFdcVRxpxUi
KMop+6uZBgLQpTkyQlZtrTV2fMJYDaAXMiPSgQ5/fv6mOlfAOGbKQwH1RviUt6s1bj
MuViVOh38OdELvyruCNKpl+XOOS5u6L3RdbrUePg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 09:41:13 +0530
From: noreply@jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com
To: debxxxxx.maxxx@hotmail.com
Subject: CentOS Web Panel Mail Antivirus Scan
Message-ID: <f2a34750ea2a8475fde1f00098130c3e@jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com>
X-Sender: noreply@jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 12
Return-Path: noreply@jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationStartTime: 05 May 2019 04:11:13.4968
(UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationStartTimeReason: OriginalSubmit
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationInterval: 2:00:00:00.0000000
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationIntervalReason: OriginalSubmit
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 374bd181-a9d6-c347-5682-08fb6d6d106f
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: EFV:NLI;
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource:
DB5EUXR03FT022.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-UserLastLogonTime: 5/5/2019 4:08:18 AM
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 37d184b1-a9d6-47c3-5682-08d6d10fb66f
X-Microsoft-Antispam:
BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(5000113)(711020)(4605104)(610169)(650170)(651021)(8291501072);SRVR:DB5EUR03HT025;
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB5EUXR03HT025:
X-MS-Exchange-EOPDirect: true
X-Sender-IP: 7X.XXX.XX.29
X-SID-PRA: NOREPLY@jxxxetxxxnxxgy.com
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2019 04:11:13.4558
(UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 37d184b1-a9d6-47c3-5682-08d6d10fb66f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg:
00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR03HT025
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:01.1839354
X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.1856.000
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
abwl:0;wl:0;pcwl:0;kl:0;iwl:0;dwl:0;dkl:0;rwl:0;ucf:0;jmr:0;ex:0;auth:1;dest:J;OFR:SpamFilterAuthJ;ENG:(5062000261)(5061607266)(5061608174)(4900115)(8390100)(4920090)(6375004)(4950130)(4990090)(9140004);RF:JunkEmail;
X-Message-Info:
qoGN4b5S4yqMATLJd7YNgfs9lEkAvJCoicfonrVap57f4TzlLwp1AzVk+SnSKBCYgVkEOrhoCuskmSFI6VGSYyRE33OtZtA8bj/edZjTP9vkUsKuCdcYJxeS59j1qu6LECJoG4wjyAKbfnyV15j3d7lVv0t6wqYBuhvzP+scBcmcrEQT4GapvgPoHhJnl0sz6rTkweiKZ6pX8Dy0bL28XA==
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTA7YT0wO0Q9MjtHRD0yO1NDTD02
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info:
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
MIME-Version: 1.0
To scan your files for viruses:
Log in to your CWP user account
On the dashboard look for the Antivirus Scan section
Choose the Scan and log only FOUND option and click the Antivirus Scan
button
Wait for a few minutes.
Go back to dashboard -> Antivirus Scan section
Choose the Get Last Scan Results option and click the Antivirus Scan
button
If there are any viruses you will see a list of the infected files,
like:
11
Postfix / spam issue: Need help regarding mail server
« on: May 03, 2019, 05:34:50 PM »
Hi...
I am new to this server thing. And I found CWP quiet easy to understand. I have built my VPS successfully. But all mails are going to spam in yahoo/hotmail/aol though my mail-tester.com score is 10/10, IP-Domain-server are not blacklisted.Senderscore: 99, mx-toolbox mail deliverability test passed without any warning.Not blacklisted with any provider.
In gmail there is no problem.
Email source from mail-tester.com is
My another domain which is hosted in shared hosting with cpanel is sending mails to inbox without any problem. mail-tester.com result is -
whats wrong with my vps mail server ? Why mails are going to the spam? Need your advice.
Also did some digging and want to make it something like which is quite similar to 2nd mail server(shared hosted) -
Can you help me, how I can change these?
Hope many people is suffering from the same problem, but no proper solution couldn't be found in the forum.
Everybody will be benefited with your suggestions.
Thanks in advance.
I am new to this server thing. And I found CWP quiet easy to understand. I have built my VPS successfully. But all mails are going to spam in yahoo/hotmail/aol though my mail-tester.com score is 10/10, IP-Domain-server are not blacklisted.Senderscore: 99, mx-toolbox mail deliverability test passed without any warning.Not blacklisted with any provider.
In gmail there is no problem.
Email source from mail-tester.com is
Quote
Received: by mail-tester.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
id E7XXXXXX29; Fri, 3 May 2019 18:07:12 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mail-tester.com;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=jxxextxxhxy.com header.i=@jxxextxxhxy.com header.b=lI34INCYS;
dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail-tester.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No/-0.2/5.0
X-Spam-Test-Scores: DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,SPF_PASS=-0.001,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-Spam-Last-External-IP: 7X.X3X.X8.92
X-Spam-Last-External-HELO: xx-x1.exxtxxsxxvxr.com
X-Spam-Last-External-rDNS: xx-x1.exxtxxsxxvxr.com
X-Spam-Date-of-Scan: Fri, 03 May 2019 18:07:12 +0200
X-Spam-Report:
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
* blocked. See
* http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
* for more information.
* [URIs: jxxextxxhxy.com]
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
* author's domain
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
* envelope-from domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=7X.X3X.X8.92; helo=xx-x1.exxtxxsxxvxr.com; envelope-from=noreply@jxxextxxhxy.com; receiver=test-yoxu6@mail-tester.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 mail-tester.com D12813F4B5
Authentication-Results: mail-tester.com; dmarc=pass header.from=jxxextxxhxy.com
Authentication-Results: mail-tester.com;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=jxxextxxhxy.com header.i=@jxxextxxhxy.com header.b=lI34INCYS;
dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from xx-x1.exxtxxsxxvxr.com (xx-x1.exxtxxsxxvxr.com [7X.X3X.X8.92])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail-tester.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14819F8B5
for <test-ynxs9@mail-tester.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 18:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xx-x1.exxtxxsxxvxr.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8FCB4971
for <test-ynxs9@mail-tester.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 18:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=jxxextxxhxy.com;
s=default; t=1976254681;
bh=wj6ml6fmjj9E0gqWuQJ2SQox9D6zvCD1qEMrCheXiz8=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject;
b=lIsC5iekbNCYS97BhjRlI21q/mZUqHtSOoOsHoenXq7TPJzLpDPHmtei7rVCaq5cH
euF4mSYuOKfaEV/Xr3m8MXNzurfxAV+JB90ZiRuCSV0fNDHfdjKZeflthtmH7CRxoc
o/eSgqOfvROZaBFkGS3uWb65Jhyob1B7aPhZ2eRk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 18:07:05 +0200
From: noreply@jxxextxxhxy.com
To: test-ynxs9@mail-tester.com
Subject: Mail Server Development Status
Message-ID: <1d3b7bd4f13085580c328c0e0b1b1724@jxxextxxhxy.com>
X-Sender: noreply@jxxextxxhxy.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam bibendum lobortis fermentum. Praesent pretium nisi non dui sollicitudin,
et cursus dolor congue. Vivamus tempus rutrum mi, et ultricies neque. Duis viverra tortor justo. Curabitur convallis velit turpis,
vitae maximus augue convallis et. Sed euismod neque et leo sagittis condimentum. Cras a felis erat. In sed lobortis ligula. Vivamus
condimentum cursus lorem nec aliquet. Aliquam scelerisque tempor elit, vel gravida dolor bibendum ac. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla ultricies enim ac tellus feugiat, vitae iaculis dolor semper. Cras non augue varius, placerat
nisl eget, sollicitudin velit. Vivamus sit amet dolor venenatis, accumsan est vitae, rhoncus turpis. Mauris id magna nec libero
accumsan semper.
My another domain which is hosted in shared hosting with cpanel is sending mails to inbox without any problem. mail-tester.com result is -
Quote
Received: by mail-tester.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 8299247F19; Fri, 3 May 2019 19:17:51 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mail-tester.com;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=exxtxx.com header.i=@exxtxx.com header.b=mMvXPkT0;
dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail-tester.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No/-0.2/5.0
X-Spam-Test-Scores: DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-Spam-Last-External-IP: 204.11.58.87
X-Spam-Last-External-HELO: bh-24.webhostbox.net
X-Spam-Last-External-rDNS: bh-24.webhostbox.net
X-Spam-Date-of-Scan: Fri, 03 May 2019 19:17:51 +0200
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
* blocked. See
* http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
* for more information.
* [URIs: exxtxx.com]
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
* author's domain
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
* envelope-from domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=204.11.58.87; helo=bh-24.webhostbox.net; envelope-from=admin@exxtxx.com; receiver=test-6a04d@mail-tester.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 mail-tester.com 309F8F8586
Authentication-Results: mail-tester.com; dmarc=pass header.from=exxtxx.com
Authentication-Results: mail-tester.com;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=exxtxx.com header.i=@exxtxx.com header.b=MXTmvPk0;
dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from bh-24.webhostbox.net (bh-24.webhostbox.net [204.11.58.87])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail-tester.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30985F8F86
for <test-6a04d@mail-tester.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 19:17:46 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=exxtxx.com;
s=default; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=Pp5yt3FXPZ0UtW516d3ugudwqyBEESyzA0u27jaCEAs=; b=mvPqn3mhrpvu9UkMXT0oR8gpv0
GHBSeEYJgQ51J/jEZ6qVPlXCd9nIce2viTUnY38yQJntLKmL1MR4Ei+TOXrlOMLs9gJEJjr4RULJz
o3r/n0zhFgHza1r4VedAaHVrrz5wrt5iDGPUoNu3T3grDwsFOYpC/aByUrvxGC9P/DuNOdUCnbfxe
EcOC5lA3Kit0bj8bgWZlbm0CRGOuq9o9qWQxasHGdEQNpk5jhOYe8Obm9SL3is2xtn5ihacV/w2aL
EcjeGMWZk5gAkm3TT2CGcmpHNnm+yDUL2eeWYN5X8vTy8SCcmsjESV7759FHAEXHpEWi73uIzSjZm
wWWFO33g==;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=50143 helo=bh-24.webhostbox.net)
by bh-24.webhostbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.91)
(envelope-from <admin@exxtxx.com>)
id 1hbfMo-00D3ob-Go
for test-ad604@mail-tester.com; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:17:45 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 17:17:45 +0000
From: admin@exxtxx.com
To: test-6a04d@mail-tester.com
Subject: App Development Status
In-Reply-To: <df397a6aed552ac17bc8607e31881595@exxtxx.com>
References: <7e317a6ae860c17bc8d552adf3981595@exxtxx.com>
Message-ID: <2c4a09126a4a45705cde659f7a5d6e0d@exxtxx.com>
X-Sender: admin@exxtxx.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.7
X-Authenticated_sender: admin@exxtxx.com
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-24.webhostbox.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - mail-tester.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - exxtxx.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-24.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: admin@exxtxx.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-24.webhostbox.net: admin@exxtxx.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam bibendum
lobortis fermentum. Praesent pretium nisi non dui sollicitudin, et
cursus dolor congue. Vivamus tempus rutrum mi, et ultricies neque. Duis
viverra tortor justo. Curabitur convallis velit turpis, vitae maximus
augue convallis et. Sed euismod neque et leo sagittis condimentum. Cras
a felis erat. In sed lobortis ligula. Vivamus condimentum cursus lorem
nec aliquet. Aliquam scelerisque tempor elit, vel gravida dolor bibendum
ac. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla
ultricies enim ac tellus feugiat, vitae iaculis dolor semper. Cras non
augue varius, placerat nisl eget, sollicitudin velit. Vivamus sit amet
dolor venenatis, accumsan est vitae, rhoncus turpis. Mauris id magna nec
libero accumsan semper.
whats wrong with my vps mail server ? Why mails are going to the spam? Need your advice.
Also did some digging and want to make it something like which is quite similar to 2nd mail server(shared hosted) -
Quote
1. Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > Received: from [host-name] (hostname [127.0.0.1])
Quote
2. DKIM KEY LENGTH (BITS): 1024 > upgrade KEY LENGTH (BITS): 2048
Quote
3. h=Date:From:To:Subject; > h=Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:
Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
Can you help me, how I can change these?
Hope many people is suffering from the same problem, but no proper solution couldn't be found in the forum.
Everybody will be benefited with your suggestions.
Thanks in advance.
Pages: [1]
