Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
61
PHP / HHVM on CentOS7 ?
« on: February 06, 2018, 09:35:33 PM »
Has anyone tried to install HHVM on CentOS 7 (cwp or non-cwp server)?
62
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: fileManager2.php missing file edit option
« on: January 17, 2018, 06:42:48 PM »
CWP uses that PHPFM but modified.
If anyone knows how CWP validate login session that original PHPFM can be used instead of CWP's modified version.
But DO NOT use phpfm as-is original, it's not secure.
If anyone knows how CWP validate login session that original PHPFM can be used instead of CWP's modified version.
But DO NOT use phpfm as-is original, it's not secure.
63
CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: fileManager2.php missing file edit option
« on: January 17, 2018, 05:18:24 AM »64
PHP / Re: PHP Selector
« on: December 14, 2017, 11:04:30 AM »
@become Why do you need 5.2 at all? Jeez that's deprecated for a long time now. It's freaking insecure, to many known exploits available for <5.5 that can seriously damage your server.
65
CentOS-WebPanel GUI / Re: Why I get "User root Invalid" when trying to log in?
« on: December 06, 2017, 12:31:01 AM »
Port :2030 for root access
Port :2082 for clients access
Port :2082 for clients access
66
Information / Re: Did You make CWP update today ?
« on: December 05, 2017, 11:20:58 PM »
@become
I agree with you. Everything you said is true. But you should have more respect, if you are some kind developer you have to know that creating such project is not a piece of cake, it's not a joke, especially when there is no two or more identical servers that will act completely the same and when only few people work on such project.
Ok, my bad, sorry it is not 99%, it's more than 90%.
As I said, I never ever had problems like you nor as a lot of people here even I'm one of the first CWP's users, ok few problems, but all of these problems I had were because i did something wrong (only that first "update" wasn't my fault, from 0.2 to 0.3 that wasn't actuall update, it was new installation that screwed one of my servers at the time
http://forum.centos-webpanel.com/installation/0-3-wont-turn-on/ ).
I am really surprised with all problems you had.
ps. there is one things I hate and thing that I don't like about the new CWP's client side, these "ajax" requests are made without any security tokens/keys, and not even login system can't block access to request url's, it's just a matter of time when someone will find a way to exploit it.
I agree with you. Everything you said is true. But you should have more respect, if you are some kind developer you have to know that creating such project is not a piece of cake, it's not a joke, especially when there is no two or more identical servers that will act completely the same and when only few people work on such project.
Ok, my bad, sorry it is not 99%, it's more than 90%.
As I said, I never ever had problems like you nor as a lot of people here even I'm one of the first CWP's users, ok few problems, but all of these problems I had were because i did something wrong (only that first "update" wasn't my fault, from 0.2 to 0.3 that wasn't actuall update, it was new installation that screwed one of my servers at the time
http://forum.centos-webpanel.com/installation/0-3-wont-turn-on/ ).I am really surprised with all problems you had.
ps. there is one things I hate and thing that I don't like about the new CWP's client side, these "ajax" requests are made without any security tokens/keys, and not even login system can't block access to request url's, it's just a matter of time when someone will find a way to exploit it.
67
Information / Re: Did You make CWP update today ?
« on: December 04, 2017, 05:46:54 PM »
@become There is, one of them: https://www.facebook.com/centoswebpanel/posts/1154357574708445
Check on forum how many posts were posted by Administrator and one of devs related to new client api that 'coming soon'.
Don't take me wrong, but if you hate CWP that much why are you still here? Why are you use CWP at this momment? There is a tone of alternatives, a lot of them are completely free for use even in the commercial purpose.
You have to respect what they do, for FREE. They spent their free time to do something that you use without paing for it. You have to respect that. A year ago when CPanel released update that had big security glitch nobody complains even you have to pay $30+ for it, every single month, and now you started to complain for something that is free and for something that some people spent their free time to work on? Think about your words next time.
I am one of first few CWP's users and I never-ever had problems like you have. 99% of all problems wroten here on the forum are posted by you, and 98% of them are just errors made because of your curiosity or your ignorance.
This is my personal opinion about your spam posts that you made every single day.
Check on forum how many posts were posted by Administrator and one of devs related to new client api that 'coming soon'.
Don't take me wrong, but if you hate CWP that much why are you still here? Why are you use CWP at this momment? There is a tone of alternatives, a lot of them are completely free for use even in the commercial purpose.
You have to respect what they do, for FREE. They spent their free time to do something that you use without paing for it. You have to respect that. A year ago when CPanel released update that had big security glitch nobody complains even you have to pay $30+ for it, every single month, and now you started to complain for something that is free and for something that some people spent their free time to work on? Think about your words next time.
I am one of first few CWP's users and I never-ever had problems like you have. 99% of all problems wroten here on the forum are posted by you, and 98% of them are just errors made because of your curiosity or your ignorance.
This is my personal opinion about your spam posts that you made every single day.
68
CentOS-WebPanel GUI / Re: cwp loading too slow after update
« on: November 30, 2017, 01:31:05 PM »
Few of my users has more than 50gigs of files outside of the public_html and cwp shows only 6MB from phtml dir. lol
EDIT: It's not even phtml dir.
EDIT: It's not even phtml dir.
69
Information / Re: Did You make CWP update today ?
« on: November 30, 2017, 01:01:04 PM »
There is no problem with login at all. When client tries to login they got message to use new login page on port :2082 instead of current one.
Also they write bunch informations about new clientside api in the past month maybe even longer.
Also they write bunch informations about new clientside api in the past month maybe even longer.
70
CentOS-WebPanel GUI / Re: cwp loading too slow after update
« on: November 30, 2017, 12:58:13 PM »
Same here.
Client side is really slow. Looks like these statistics are made directly while page is loading on clientside and that is really bad idea.
It has to be done with ajax, not like this.
Also there is a few gui bugs with statistics (such as wrong db percentage has been calculated, storage in use shows only public_html folder not entire users home directory, etc.).
Client side is really slow. Looks like these statistics are made directly while page is loading on clientside and that is really bad idea.
It has to be done with ajax, not like this.
Also there is a few gui bugs with statistics (such as wrong db percentage has been calculated, storage in use shows only public_html folder not entire users home directory, etc.).
71
Installation / Re: OK.. So where is the download
« on: November 26, 2017, 11:58:50 AM »
You have INSTALLATION button on the home page of CWP in the main navigation menu.
http://centos-webpanel.com/installation-instructions
http://centos-webpanel.com/installation-instructions
72
FTP / Re: TLS problem
« on: November 25, 2017, 09:40:40 AM »
Same problem here, any fix for it? FTP only, SFTP works fine.
EDIT: Ok, this helps. But that shouldn't be fix for CWP's problems.
https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/pureftpd-tls-on-centos/
EDIT: Ok, this helps. But that shouldn't be fix for CWP's problems.
https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/pureftpd-tls-on-centos/
73
Suggestions / Custom package values per user
« on: November 04, 2017, 01:51:54 PM »
Please implement custom package values per user same as CPanel has.
It would be nice to update just one user rather than whole package on any changes that have to be made for a specific user.
Example:
If user has custom value > 0 for storage quota then storage amount from package itself should be ignored.
That includes parked domains, subdomains, email and ftp accounts, etc.
Same thing as CPanel has. It's not that difficult to add few if statements.
It would be nice to update just one user rather than whole package on any changes that have to be made for a specific user.
Example:
If user has custom value > 0 for storage quota then storage amount from package itself should be ignored.
That includes parked domains, subdomains, email and ftp accounts, etc.
Same thing as CPanel has. It's not that difficult to add few if statements.
74
Scripts / Re: StingRay's Dark Theme for CWP
« on: October 31, 2017, 11:12:52 AM »
@midzan21 How did you manage to delete locked custom.css?
EDIt: Ok, I found way.
EDIt: Ok, I found way.
Code: [Select]
cd /usr/local/cwpsrv/htdocs/admin/design
chattr -d -suSiadAc ./css/
cd /usr/local/cwpsrv/htdocs/admin/design/css
chattr -a FILE_NAME
chattr -i FILE_NAME
75
Scripts / Re: StingRay's Dark Theme for CWP
« on: October 30, 2017, 08:57:42 PM »
@become It is already on Bootstrap3. That "Supr" theme is based on Bootstrap3.
The main problem is that CWP does not use any templating engine. Everything is hardcoded. Basically with only .css files you can't do much. And atm even .css files are locked so you can't edit them at all...unless you do some sneaky things to unlock them, but as I said, you can't do much even with unlocked .css. If you want to create custom design without html code itself you can't do much.
The main problem is that CWP does not use any templating engine. Everything is hardcoded. Basically with only .css files you can't do much. And atm even .css files are locked so you can't edit them at all...unless you do some sneaky things to unlock them, but as I said, you can't do much even with unlocked .css. If you want to create custom design without html code itself you can't do much.
