Show Posts

61

CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Re: Mail forwarding problem

« on: February 26, 2020, 06:45:57 PM »

Error Log

Feb 26 13:42:04 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: lost connection after RCPT from unknown[71.214.155.80]
Feb 26 13:42:04 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: disconnect from unknown[71.214.155.80] ehlo=2 starttls=1 auth=1 mail=1 rcpt=0/1 commands=5/6
Feb 26 13:43:21 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: warning: hostname 71-214-155-80.orlf.qwest.net does not resolve to address 71.214.155.80: Name or service not known
Feb 26 13:43:21 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: connect from unknown[71.214.155.80]
Feb 26 13:43:21 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: Anonymous TLS connection established from unknown[71.214.155.80]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)
Feb 26 13:43:22 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[71.214.155.80]: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table; from=<2019@lakeservers.com> to= proto=ESMTP helo=<[192.168.0.8]>
Feb 26 13:43:23 server postfix/smtpd[26363]: disconnect from unknown[71.214.155.80] ehlo=2 starttls=1 auth=1 mail=1 rcpt=0/1 quit=1 commands=6/7

71.214.155.80 is house ip

62

CentOS-WebPanel Bugs / Mail forwarding problem

« on: February 26, 2020, 01:48:58 PM »

So I created an email forward rule on a domain from control panel. Then I deleted the forwarding rule. Now all incoming emails are rejected on that one domain even though there are no forwarding rules.

I tried rebuilding mail server, problem persists.

63

E-Mail / Re: User unknown in virtual mailbox table

« on: February 26, 2020, 01:36:56 PM »

Ok. This problem has something to do with forwarding. New email accounts on server #1 work fine on other domain. The problem is rosinto.com.

Last night I tried to create a forwarding of simhof@rosinto.com. then I deleted the forwarding rule in control panel. After that, nothing works with rosinto.com inbound email.

So. THIS IS EMAIL FORWARDING PROBLEM.

64

E-Mail / User unknown in virtual mailbox table

« on: February 26, 2020, 01:15:13 PM »

I created a new email account (simhof@rosinto.com) on server #1 tonight and I tested inbound to the new email account on server #1 from Server #2. I get the following error (from tbird and roundcube) when attempting to send to the new email account (simhof@rosinto.com) from server #2. But interestingly, email from server #1 to server #1 works properly as local email. I tried tbird and roundcube both and got the same error.

An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded:
550 5.1.1 <simhof@rosinto.com>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table.
Please check the message recipient "simhof@rosinto.com" and try again.

This is only happening to new email accounts on the server #1. Previously created email accounts on server #1 work fine.

65

Installation / Re: [Suggestion] Installation Instructions

« on: February 23, 2020, 02:38:00 PM »

Im guessing that they mean the httpd entry for root email.

66

PHP / Re: PHP Not Working

« on: February 23, 2020, 12:01:02 AM »

do the fix permissions again but do not use nobody. and click on the first box.

67

PHP / Re: PHP Not Working

« on: February 22, 2020, 11:02:46 PM »

Also most likely htaccess is your problem. rename it and try loading the page.

68

PHP / Re: PHP Not Working

« on: February 22, 2020, 11:00:35 PM »

you can turn off mod sec and firewall and that will tell you if that is the problem

Also, have you tried user accounts. Fix permissions.?

69

Installation / Re: Not Working

« on: February 22, 2020, 02:19:42 PM »

Quote from: Sirianni142 on February 22, 2020, 04:18:14 AM

Hello,

My software is not working properly what to do?

Regards.

The easy solution is to reinstall everything. Then check back. Make sure you follow the directions. On more than one installation I was in a hurry and didnt realize I was installing centos 6 and not centos 7.

Here is the install link http://centos-webpanel.com/cwp-installation

Anyone here can install it for you at no charge, just ask.

I hope my answer was more useful than the previous answer.